top of page

New H-2A Wage Rates Are Here: What Agricultural Employers Need to Know

  • Writer: Meagan Kirchner
    Meagan Kirchner
  • Aug 3
  • 4 min read

Agricultural employers have been waiting on the Department of Labor to publish new H-2A Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWRs), and just as eager to learn how quickly they would need to comply. Federal officials released a public inspection copy of the new rates, set for official publication in the Federal Register on Monday, August 3, 2026. Here is what H-2A employers need to know, including the question we have been fielding most: does this mean wages change mid-season?


Does This Mean Employers Must Change Wages Right Now, Mid-Season?

In short: yes, but only in one direction. Under the regulations governing H-2A wage obligations, the required wage is always the highest of the AEWR, the prevailing wage, any collectively bargained rate, or the applicable state or federal minimum wage. That floor can move upward mid-contract, and it has before. When a new AEWR is published and it is higher than what an employer is currently paying, the employer must raise pay to match the new rate as of the effective date, even if that falls in the middle of an active, already-certified job order.


The reverse is not true. If the newly published AEWR is lower than the wage already guaranteed on a certified job order, the employer does not get to reduce pay. They must continue paying the higher rate that was certified for that contract. This is exactly what the DOL notice underlying this update reinforces, and it lines up with how AEWR updates have consistently worked in the past.


There is no built-in grace period in the rule for the increase scenario, so employers should not treat this as something to revisit only at recertification. If the new rate applicable to a job order is higher than current pay, the obligation to adjust begins on the effective date itself.


Quick Background


The DOL issued an interim final rule in October 2025 that significantly reshaped how AEWRs are calculated. Under the new framework, the agency sets AEWRs using a skill-based, occupation-specific wage structure rather than the prior regional survey approach. The United Farm Workers is currently challenging the rule in litigation, but a federal court in California has already denied the union's request to block the rule while that case proceeds.


When Are the New Rates Effective


For most states, the new rates take effect immediately upon publication on August 3. A small group of states covered by a 2024 court ruling tied to the Farmworker Protection Rule gets a later effective date of August 17. That group includes Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.


What Are the New Rates


The DOL's H-2A AEWR page now hosts an Excel workbook with statewide AEWRs for all non-range occupations, along with the adverse compensation adjustment amounts. The first tab covers the Field and Livestock Worker Category, commonly called the Big 5 agricultural occupations under SOC codes 45-2041, 45-2091, 45-2092, 45-2093, and 53-7064, which together account for the majority of H-2A jobs. The second tab covers everything outside that category, including roles like truck drivers, mechanics, and first-line supervisors. Each tab is broken down further by state and by skill level.


Rates will vary meaningfully depending on whether a job falls into a Big 5 occupation or another occupation, and further by skill level and by the adverse compensation adjustment, which is meant to account for employer-provided benefits such as no-cost housing.


Employers should keep the wage hierarchy in mind: pay must equal the highest of the AEWR, the state minimum wage, the federal minimum wage, or the prevailing wage. In practice, this means the new AEWR changes nothing for employers in states where the minimum wage already exceeds the new rate, California being a common example. And as covered above, if the new AEWR comes in below what is already guaranteed on a job order, the employer keeps paying the higher, previously certified rate.


Surety Bond Impact for H-2ALC Employers


Farm labor contractors should note a separate figure: the national average AEWR used to calculate H-2ALC surety bonds dropped from $17.74, where it had stood since January 1, 2025, to $15.96. This average is used only to calculate the surety bond amount farm labor contractors must purchase when applying to hire H-2A workers. It is not a wage anyone is actually paid; it simply averages a single occupation's rate across states as one input into the bond formula. The practical effect is that H-2ALC employers should see a reduction in their bond costs.


A Note on California


California lawmakers are separately considering AB 2646, a bill that would effectively raise the hourly wage floor to $19.75 for H-2A workers and for what the bill calls corresponding employees. As currently drafted, that term is broader than the federal H-2A definition and would sweep in any other agricultural employee performing similar work at the same time, for the same employer, in the same county, even outside the H-2A-approved fields. The bill passed the Assembly in May and now awaits action in the Senate, with the Governor's signature still an open question. Employers with California operations should watch this closely, since it could layer an additional wage floor on top of the federal changes.


What Employers Should Do Now


Employers with active H-2A job orders should pull the new state-specific wage tables as soon as they are posted and compare the applicable rate against what is currently being paid on each certified contract. If the new rate is higher, payroll needs to reflect that increase as of the effective date in that state, not at the next recertification cycle. If the new rate is lower, no action is required and the currently certified rate continues to control. H-2ALC employers should also confirm their bond amount reflects the updated national average before their next renewal.


This area remains in flux given the pending UFW litigation and California's proposed legislation, and we will continue monitoring both alongside the federal AEWR updates.

Comments


bottom of page